Suggested length: 2-3 class periods (45-55 minutes each)
Device accessibility: 1 device per 1-2 students
- At a glance
- Learning objective(s)
- Prior knowledge
- Teacher preparation
- Provided materials
- Lesson plan
- Related Kialo discussion
- Downloadable files
At a glance
In this lesson, students will explore a fully developed Kialo discussion on the thesis, “Affirmative Action Should Be Required in College Admissions.” Topics such as affirmative action measures can be intricate and complex. This lesson aims to present the strongest case possible for each side so that the students can make informed interpretations.
The students will first explore the Kialo discussion independently and then prepare an argumentative presentation about affirmative action in a real-life context. Students will be assessed on this presentation.
In this lesson, students will:
- Compare arguments for and against affirmative action measures.
- Express an informed opinion on this subject using reasons and evidence.
- Create and recommend solutions for a real-life case.
Students should have familiarity with affirmative action measures in college admissions, though it is not essential. It is recommended to briefly discuss the term “affirmative action” with the students before the activity.
- There is no need to clone this discussion. Students can explore the discussion hosted on the Kialo_Edu account by clicking this link.
- If you would like to invite students to the discussion using the "Share" button or the Teams feature, create 1 clone of the discussion for yourself.
- When inviting students to the discussion, give them Viewer permissions.
- The Kialo discussion “Affirmative Action Should Be Required in College Admissions.” (Also embedded below.) This consists of:
- Instructions for students
- A brief background on topic
- A fully developed discussion containing arguments for and against the thesis “Race-based affirmative action measures should be implemented in college admissions.”
- Instructions for students (.docx / .pdf)
- Lesson plan for educators (.docx / .pdf)
- Suggested rubric for grading a presentation (.docx / .pdf)
- Click here to download all additional resources (.zip).
- Opener (15 minutes)
- Part A: Explore the Kialo discussion (focus of partial class period)
- Part B: Introducing the case study (focus of partial class period)
- Part C: Working on presentations (focus of partial class period)
- Part D: Deliver presentations (focus of 1-2 class periods)
- Optional closer (5 minutes)
Student groups will be assessed on an oral presentation.
Opener (15 minutes)
- Go over the Opener section of the Student Instructions. Have students share their answers and opinions.
- Show four different profiles of highly qualified college applicants, and ask your students to discuss in pairs which two they would admit to college:
- Ask students to share their answers and rationale. Then reveal to students the demographic information of each applicant:
- Student 1: Latino male
- Student 2: Black female
- Student 3: White male
- Student 4: Asian female
- Ask students if this information changes students’ answers to the question of admission, and why.
Part A: Explore the Kialo discussion (focus of partial class period)
- Go over Part A of the student instructions.
- Conduct a quick class discussion on what students shared with their partners.
Part B: Introducing the case study (focus of partial class period)
- Go over Part B of the student instructions. Show students the statistics from Stanford University’s 2020 fall admissions and the 2019 US census data.
- Discuss as a class: are Black/African American students sufficiently represented in the admissions profile? Should Stanford take any action to change this?
Part B: Preparing the presentations (focus of partial class period)
- Go over Part C of the student instructions and distribute the presentation rubric.
Part C: Deliver presentations (1-2 class periods)
- Groups deliver presentations.
Optional closer (10 minutes)
- Ask students to reflect and answer the following questions independently before they leave class:
- Have your views on the topic changed? If so, how? If not, why not?
- Do you think any other aspect of this issue should be studied further?